USPTO serial 77058056
SCIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE H. SALES
BRUCE H SALES LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & ET AL600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING AND COORDINATING EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS DEVOTED TO THE CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS; CONDUCTING LIVE EDUCATIONAL EVENTS, NAMELY, CONFERENCES, MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIUMS FOR HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS; DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF HEALTHCARE, NAMELY, SLIDES, MONOGRAPHS, JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, NEWSLETTERS, CDs, DVDs, AND VIDEOS; OFFERING MEDICAL EDUCATIONAL COURSES USING DISTANCE LEARNING ON THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |