USPTO serial 77058163
PANPASTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANPASTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle T. Peterson
KYLE T PETERSON PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN80 S 8TH ST STE 4800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |