Drawing for TI TEXAS INSTRUMENTS

USPTO serial 77058248

TI TEXAS INSTRUMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TI TEXAS INSTRUMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Levine

STEPHEN L LEVINE TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATEDPO BOX 655474MS 3999DALLAS, TX 75265

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Calculators, including hand-held, scientific, general purpose, and business calculators, wireless classroom network; semiconductor devices, including integrated circuits, microprocessors, and microcomputers; digital imaging systems, comprising micromirrors separately controlled to create a digital imageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 13, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance