USPTO serial 77058660
LA CHULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2008
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LA CHULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
La Libertad, SV
Other trademarks owned by Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
La Libertad, SV
Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
San Salvador, SV
Other trademarks owned by Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
San Salvador, SV
Other trademarks owned by Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
San Salvador, SV
San Salvador, SV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [Coffee, tea, sugar,] rice, [tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes, flour, processed cereals, bread, pastas, pastries and confectionery, namely, pastilles, honey, Molasses syrup, yeast, ice cream, baking powders, salt, pepper, mustard, vinegar, ]sauces, salad sauces[, seasonings, spices] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
- Other trademarks owned by Simán Daboub, Rolando Javier
- Other trademarks owned by Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
- Other trademarks owned by Gonzalez Giner, Ricardo Ramon Ernesto
- Other trademarks owned by Simán Daboub, Rolando Javier
- Other trademarks owned by Simán Daboub, Rolando Javier
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LA CHULA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2019 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 29, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |