USPTO serial 77058896
PEEKY TOES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEEKY TOES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keum J. Park
MAYER & WILLIAMSKEUM J PARK251 N AVE W STE 2WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1499Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Foot and hand care creams, lotions, and gels; nail care preparations; body and beauty care creams, lotions, and gels; non-medicated foot creams; foot and hand massage creams, lotions, gels, and oils; foot and nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, nail polish, creams, cleansers, scrubs, and oils; soaps and cleansers for hand, foot, face, and body; non-medicated bath preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing not for infants, namely, pedicure socks with removable toe cap; pedicure slippers; pedicure sandals; manicure gloves; gloves for personal hand conditioning use; loungewear; sleepwear; pajamas; maternity wear, namely, maternity slippers, maternity shoes; maternity sleepwear; shirts; pants; sports shirts, sports jackets, sports pants; athletic footwear; anti-perspirant socks; swim wear; bathing suits; water shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peeky International, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Peeky International, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PEEKY TOES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |