Drawing for QOOB

USPTO serial 77059338

QOOB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QOOB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038BROADCASTING OF PROGRAMS VIA CABLE AND SATELLITE TELEVISION, VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, VIA RADIO AND AUDIO BROADCASTING AND VIA BROADBAND AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONSACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND PROVIDING EDITORIAL CONTENT, NAMELY, ONGOING LIVE AND RECORDED TELEVISION PROGRAMS ON THE SUBJECTS OF MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED OVER TELEVISION, SATELLITE, FILM, AUDIO, VIDEO, INTERNET, AND 3-D VIRTUAL REALITY MEDIA; TELEVISION PROGRAMS SYNDICATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 21, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 20, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance