USPTO serial 77059357
SPORTMORPHIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTMORPHIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GLASGOW, GB
GLASGOW, GB
GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN, KY
GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN
RICHARD C. LITMAN LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD.P.O. BOX 15035CRYSTAL CITY STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and tv programmes provided via a video-on-demand service; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; Communications via multinational telecommunication networks; Data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; Mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; Providing access to telecommunication networks; Providing electronic telecommunication connections; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Telecommunication access services; Transfer of data by telecommunications; Transmission of information on optical telecommunication networks; Wireless telephone telecommunications services, namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN W. HANNAY & CO LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN W. HANNAY & CO LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by QMORPHIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by QMORPHIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SPORTMORPHIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |