Drawing for SURVIVOR SERIES

USPTO serial 77061046

SURVIVOR SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3985965Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 28, 2011
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with SURVIVOR SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.1241 East Main StreetStamford, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toy action wrestling figures; board games featuring wrestling; playing cards featuring wrestling; [ stand alone video output game machines featuring wrestling; arcade games related to wrestling; pinball games related to wrestling; hand-held units for playing electronic game; tabletop action skill games related to wrestling; jigsaw puzzles featuring wrestling; ] toy wrestling rings; bobble-head dolls; [ puppets; stuffed toy animals; ] card games featuring wrestling; [ Christmas tree decorations; costume masks; ] toy belts, doll furniture; [ party favors in the nature of crackers and noisemakers ]ACTIVEJun 30, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 20, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 15, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 15, 2021NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2021RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 15, 202189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 15, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2021E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2020REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 23, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2017PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 26, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 14, 2017E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 27, 2011SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
May 26, 2011REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2011CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 25, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 22, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 22, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 1, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 22, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 16, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 16, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance