USPTO serial 77061565
GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3403762Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tal Grinblat
Tal Grinblat LEWITT, HACKMAN, SHAPIRO, MARSHALL & HARLAN16633 VENTURA BLVD, STE 1100ENCINO, CA 91436-1865UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit card transaction verification and electronic processing of electronic payments via phone lines and the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 20, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |