USPTO serial 77061761
GRADATIM FEROCITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRADATIM FEROCITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. H
HEIDI L. SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs to effect simulation of flight, space launch and space flight; computer hardware and software for use in engineering, design, and modeling of aerospace and aerospace-related advanced technologies; computer information and communications software for the retrieval, organization, manipulation, management and other control of data and information for use in the fields of astronomy, space and outer space exploration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |