Drawing for HLC

USPTO serial 77062272

HLC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3370008Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2008
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with HLC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Shipley

Howard N. Shipley Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP101 West Broadway, Suite 1600San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Dinnerware; casseroles; bowls; vases; pie pans; pitchers; carafes; trays, not of precious metal; salt and pepper shakers; teapots; candlestick; sugar basins, cream pitcher; sugar packet holder; servingware for serving foodACTIVEDec 31, 1904

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 6, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 1, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 21, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 21, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 21, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 12, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 28, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 10, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 29, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 15, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 15, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 2, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 22, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance