USPTO serial 77062333
HEALTHY PICK?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHY PICK??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | PROVIDING A WEBSITE THAT FEATURES INFORMATION CONCERNING NUTRITION AND WELLNESS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |