USPTO serial 77062445
BRIGHT IDEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2007
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BRIGHT IDEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Owner
Core Education and Consulting Solutions, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by Core Education and Consulting Solutions, Inc.
Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
Woodstock, GA
Other trademarks owned by Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
Woodstock, GA
Other trademarks owned by Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
Woodstock, GA
Other trademarks owned by Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward T. White
Edward T. White LECLAIRRYAN919 East Main StreetTwenty-Fourth FloorRichmond, VA 23219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in data and database management and legal compliance in the field of special education and child care, and user manuals sold therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 035 | Data management services | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing temporary access to non-downloadable software on a global computer network for use in data and database management and legal compliance in the field of special education and child care; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in data and database management and legal compliance in the field of special education and child care; Design, development and implementation of software for use in data and database management and legal compliance in the field of special education and child care; Development of software for use in data and database management and legal compliance in the field of special education and child care; Consulting services in the field of use and implementation of software for use in data and database management and legal compliance in the field of special education and child care; Development of custom software for use in data and database management and legal compliance in the field of special education and child care; and Database development services | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Education and Consulting Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enterprises Computing Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRIGHT IDEA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 20, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |