USPTO serial 77063163
CORDOCLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORDOCLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baie D'Urfe, CA
Baie D'Urfe, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Clothesline | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |