USPTO serial 77063375
EMUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4228253Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2012
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Weinstein
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLPSEAPORT WORLD TRADE CENTERWEST 155 SEAPORT BOULEVARDBOSTON, MA 02210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for the creation of advertising, interactive advertising, television and on-line programming and the placing of such advertising, interactive advertising, television and on-line programming across telephone, cell phone, IP/TV and broadband platforms; hosting of websites for others; hosting digital content on the Internet; application service provider (ASP) featuring computer software that provides an on-line database in the field of transaction processing which permits users to upload transactional data, provide statistical analyses, and generate notifications and reports; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider (ASP) in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; design and development of computer hardware and software; design and development of interactive television software and hardware; consulting regarding the foregoing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |