USPTO serial 77064926
VISIBLE PATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIBLE PATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHORT HILLS, NJ
Foster City, CA
SHORT HILLS, NJ
SHORT HILLS, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTD180 N. STETSONSUITE 4900 TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZACHICAGO, IL 60601-6731Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in social network analysis; computer software for improving selling, marketing, hiring, business development, knowledge management, expertise location, and other inbound and outbound business processes, using relationship networks, relationship capital management, and personal and professional networks; computer software for use in sales force automation and customer relationship management, including marketing automation; collaboration computer software, namely, computer software for collaboration among business users for professional and interpersonal networking; computer software development tools for use in computer software development and web services development; computer software for electronic mail; computer software for use as a personal calendar; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; computer software for use in recruiting employees; computer software for use in human resources management; computer software for use in human capital management, namely, management of employee and business contact relationships, human resources, and employee recruiting; computer software for use in marketing automation; user manuals supplied as a unit with the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | developing, planning, coordinating, administrating, analyzing, and reporting sales strategies and plans that make use of viral marketing and social networking methods, approaches and techniques; marketing consulting services; developing, planning, coordinating, administrating, analyzing, and reporting marketing strategies and plans that make use of viral marketing and social networking methods, approaches and techniques; recruiting services, namely, personnel recruitment consulting services, personnel placement and recruitment, employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; human resources management services; human capital management services, namely, maintaining and managing relationship network information for others, namely, management and compilation of computerized databases featuring interpersonal relationship information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | web messaging and electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education and training in the theories and applications of social network analysis, sales force automation, and customer relationship management, including application to marketing automation, human resources management, human capital management, employee relationship management, and employee recruiting, provided through seminars, classes, and workshops | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in sales force automation and customer relationship management, including marketing automation; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable collaboration software, namely, computer software for collaboration among business users for professional and interpersonal networking; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in recruiting employees; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in human resources management; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in human capital management, namely, management of employee and business contact relationships, human resources, and employee recruiting; consulting services in the field of software development and web services development; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; installation and maintenance of computer software for others; technical support service, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software via telephone, email, online messaging and in person | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DUN & BRADSTREET, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Visible Path Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by HOOVER'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HOOVER'S, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VISIBLE PATH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |