USPTO serial 77065137
ON TOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ON TOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | organizing and conducting chaperoned travel programs for students which combine sightseeing, outdoor activities, community service and/or language and immersion in North America, Europe, the Caribbean and Australia | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GEA2 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |