USPTO serial 77066035
CORESYSTEMS ENGINEERED TO PERFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORESYSTEMS ENGINEERED TO PERFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Central processing units (CPU); Communications servers; Computer hardware; Computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still image and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; Computer hardware and software used for the control of voice controlled information and communication devices; Computer hardware for telecommunications; Mounting racks for computer hardware | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 2006 |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of computer hardware; Maintenance of computer hardware; Updating of computer hardware; Upgrading of computer hardware | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 2006 |
| 042 | Computer hardware development; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Customization of computer hardware and software; Design of computer hardware, integrated circuits, communications hardware and software and computer networks for others; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |