USPTO serial 77066887
SILVER STANDARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4420194Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 2013
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILVER STANDARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce M. Green
Bruce M. Green Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP480 - 601 West Cordova StreetVancouver, BC, V6B1G1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Mining extraction of precious metals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Silver Standard Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Silver Standard Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Silver Standard Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SILVER STANDARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |