USPTO serial 77067599
INTELLIGENCE FOR HEALTHCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENCE FOR HEALTHCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eden Prairie, MN
Eden Prairie, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Groos
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research and consulting services for others in the field of health care data analysis; health data warehousing; data warehouse development and consulting services; data mining and data mining consulting services; application service provider (ASP) featuring software used for reporting and analyzing medical costs and health care claims data; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for analyzing cost utilization patterns, transactional data and financial data in the health care industry; providing online non-downloadable software for accessing and manipulating health insurance claims data and other medical data; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use with coding and compliance in the health care industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |