USPTO serial 77068997
SAN LOGICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3597032Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAN LOGICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel N. Bock
Joel N. Bock, Esq. DENTONS US LLPWACKER DRIVE STATION, WILLIS TOWERP. O. BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for collecting, managing, analyzing, correlating, monitoring, reporting on, auditing, trending/forecasting, presenting and displaying information related to enterprise-wide storage area networks (SAN) and its related infrastructure data components; computer software used in the design, provision, management, generating workflow and ensuring compliance for the SAN infrastructure; SAN web services software, namely, web browser based software for optimizing SAN infrastructure, SAN application server software, namely, computer software for controlling and managing access to server applications, SAN service delivery platform for optimizing accessability to and use of SAN software applications used by consultants, SAN decision support system platform consisting of software for managing and enhancing SAN environment in aid of SAN projects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANpulse Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SANpulse Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SANpulse Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SAN LOGICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |