USPTO serial 77069038
TUNHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3648019Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TUNHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
Changji, Xinjiang, CN
Other trademarks owned by Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
Changji, Xinjiang, CN
Other trademarks owned by Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
Changji, Xinjiang, CN
Other trademarks owned by Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
COFCO XINJIANG TUNHE CO., LTD.
CHANGJI, XINJIANG, CN
COFCO XINJIANG TUNHE CO., LTD.
CHANGJI, XINJIANG, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel R. Leeman
Joel R. Leeman SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP125 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Colorants for use in the manufacture of beverages and food; pigments, namely, lycopene | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2002 |
| 029 | Canned tomato chunks; canned vegetables; preserved, cooked and dried tomatoes; fruit pulp; tomato juice for cooking; tomato powder; apricot puree concentrate; peach puree concentrate; grape puree | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2002 |
| 030 | tomato ketchup; tomato sauce | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2002 |
| 032 | Tomato juice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Xinjiang Tunhe Investment Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by COFCO XINJIANG TUNHE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by COFCO XINJIANG TUNHE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TUNHE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |