USPTO serial 77069813
PINK CRATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3808633Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PINK CRATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah K. Willey
SARAH K. WILLEY DONOVAN HATEM LLP2 SEAPORT LANEBOSTON, MA, 02210-2001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Plastic crates, wood crates | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2007 |
| 036 | Charitable fund raising | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2007 |
| 039 | Rental of moving and storage equipment, namely, crates, dollies, carriers, hand trucks, trucks, vans, automobiles, automobile freight trailers, hitches, pads, tow bars, vehicles, moving vans, moving boxes, storage rooms, storage containers, shipping containers, general storage services; warehouse space, storage space, cargo handling, moving van services, moving van transport, delivery of goods by truck, car or van | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |