CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MYHOME

USPTO serial 77070598

MYHOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYHOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

David A.W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that may be downloaded from a global computer network for managing and configuring all networked devices in a homeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 16, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2009IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2009INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jan 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 22, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Dec 15, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Dec 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 26, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 21, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance