USPTO serial 77071657
WIDGETSTATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIDGETSTATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Zarley
TIMOTHY J. ZARLEY ZARLEY LAW FIRM, P.L.C.CAPITAL SQUARE, SUITE 200400 LOCUST STREETDES MOINES, IA 50309-2350Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; RECORDED COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR DOWNLOADING AND RUNNING STREAMING AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND FOR PERFORMING TASK-BASED FUNCTIONS; RECORDED COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY, PROGRAMS FOR DOWNLOADING AND RUNNING STREAMING AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND FOR PERFORMING TASK-BASED FUNCTIONS; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FOR DOWNLOADING AND RUNNING STREAMING AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND FOR PERFORMING TASK-BASED FUNCTIONS; COMPACT ELECTRONIC DEVICES THAT CAN OPERATE AND DISPLAY AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA CONTENTS VIA THE INTERNET AND COMPUTER NETWORKS, NAMELY, DESK CLOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR DOWNLOADING AND RUNNING STREAMING AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; HOSTING COMPUTER SITES, NAMELY, WEB SITES OF OTHERS; CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; CONVERSION OF DATA OR DOCUMENTS FROM PHYSICAL TO ELECTRONIC MEDIA; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SYSTEM DESIGN; DATA CONVERSION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND DATA; DUPLICATION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS; COMPUTER RENTAL; RECOVERY OF COMPUTER DATA; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |