USPTO serial 77072081
SUPERCEUTICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3493232Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERCEUTICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DEL MAR, CA
Richmond, VA
Richmond, VA
Richmond, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent M. Walker
Kent M. Walker Lewis Kohn & Walker LLP15030 Avenue of ScienceSuite 201San Diego, CA 92128Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, skin lotions, hand lotions, face lotions, non-medicated sunburn lotions, body lotions, essential oils for personal use, face powder, suntan lotions, suntan creams, body sprays; skin toners; facial, body, cold, eye, hand, night, shaving, skin, cleansing, wrinkle vanishing, cuticle, hair removal, lip and nail creams; skin clarifiers; skin bleaching preparations; anti-aging preparations, namely, anti-age/anti-wrinkle cream, firming cream, anti-wrinkle eye cream, non-medicated wrinkle removing skin care preparations, age spot reduction cream; age retardant gels and sprays; age retardant lotions, creams, gels, body milks; lotions and pomades for non-medicated skin care and depigmentation; deodorants and anti-perspirants; topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated acne treatment preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2004 |
| 005 | Medicated lotions, oils, powders, ointments and sprays for disorders of the skin, hand, face, hair, body, sunburn and feet; medicated sunscreens; medicated skin gels, lotions and creams for accelerating or extending tans; multipurpose medicated antibiotic cream, analgesic balm; medicated body, skin and facial sprays; medicated bath, skin, eye and dental gels; medicated skin toners; medicated shampoos; medicated skin cleansers; medicated facial, body, cold, eye, hand, night, shaving, skin, cleansing, wrinkle, vanishing, cuticle, hair removal, hair growth, lip and nail creams; medicated skin clarifiers; medicated facial exfoliating preparations; medicated skin bleaching preparations; medicated anti-aging preparations, namely, anti-age/anti-wrinkle creams, firming creams, age retardant gels and sprays, age retardant lotions, creams, gels, body milks for therapeutic purposes; lotions and pomades for medical use for skin care and depigmentation of skin; medicated topical protectants, namely, skin salves, lotions, sprays, ointments, pastes, creams, solutions and gels for therapeutic purposes, topical analgesic preparations, topical antibiotic preparations, and medicated acne treatment preparations; hair growth cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SKINSCIPAC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. CosmeceuTechs, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. CosmeceuTechs, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. CosmeceuTechs, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SUPERCEUTICAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 26, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |