USPTO serial 77072563
BABYJOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABYJOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas B. Cannon
DOUGLAS B. CANNON FABIAN & CLENDENIN215 S STATE ST FL 12SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2319UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded DVDs featuring sports, fitness, exercise, recreational, educational and musical content for infants, toddlers and children | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |