Drawing for SKY CELL

USPTO serial 77072748

SKY CELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKY CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C Bruce Hamburg

C BRUCE HAMBURG JORDAN AND HAMBURG LLP122 E 42ND STRM 4000NEW YORK, NY 10168-0069

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Metal and non-metal air tanks for the storage of air for use for scuba divers and firemenACTIVE
012Land vehicle parts, namely, metal and non-metal fuel tanks for the storage of natural gas and for the storage of hydrogenACTIVE
020Non-metal storage tanks for large scale storage of natural gas for use in vehicles and for hydrogen for use in vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 26, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2007CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Apr 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 24, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Apr 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance