USPTO serial 77072979
ROADEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROADEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
Helen Hill Minsker Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.Ten South Wacker DriveSuite 3000Chicago, IL 60606-7407Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | forward looking radar for use with adaptive cruise control/collision warning systems in automobiles, trucks and buses | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | distributorships in the field of radar for use with adaptive cruise control/collision warning systems in automobiles, trucks and buses | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | custom manufacture of forward looking radar for use with adaptive cruise control/collision warnign systems in automobiles, trucks and buses for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |