USPTO serial 77073188
EURO ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EURO ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Gillespie
91 Lichfield RoadMarkham, Ontario, L3R 0W9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetic and body care products, namely, eye shadows, mascara, eye make-up removers, eyeliners, false eyelashes, eye powders, foundations, face powders, lipsticks, lip liners, blushes, eyebrow pencils, skin soap, eau de toilette, essential oils, body creams, facial and body scrubs, purifying cleansers and purifying toners for the skin, day and night moisturizing creams for face and body, cosmetic eye creams, facial masks, skin masks, body masks, non medicated cosmetic regenerating creams for cellular regeneration of the skin, herbal bath oils, body oils, cosmetic oils, massage oils, hair oils, shampoo, hair conditioner, and skin moisturizers; aromatherapy oils, incense, nail polish and nail care creams and conditioners, bath salts, non medicated bath preparations, pre-shaving and shaving soaps, gels, foams and creams, after-shave preparations, namely, balms, lotions and gels, talcum powders | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | wholesale and retail store services featuring beauty salon equipment and supplies, namely, beauty care equipment and instruments, namely, hand tools and hand operated implements used by beauticians, aestheticians, cosmetologists, hairdressers, manicurists and pedicurists, namely, scissors, clippers and rasps, photo rejuvenation machines, infrared heat lamps, infrared heat saunas, body and facial scrub brushes, massage apparatus, namely, massage tables, massage chairs, laser skin treatment machines, laser hair removal machines and equipment, aesthetician, cosmetologist, beautician and spa furniture, including tables, chairs, stools, facial and body treatment tables, manicure tables, benches, facial beds, facial chairs, hair styling chairs, hair shampoo stations, pedicure stations, pedicure chairs, treatment and work chairs for facial, pedicures and manicures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Essensa Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EURO ESSENTIALS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EURO ESSENTIALS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EURO ESSENTIALS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |