USPTO serial 77073523
LIVING IN HARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4718472Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2015
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIVING IN HARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald A. Gowan
Gerald A. Gowan Ridout & Maybee LLP2000 Argentia RoadPlaza 1, Suite 301Mississauga, Ontario, L5N1P7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing training programs in the nature of seminars, retreats, conferences, workshops, lectures, classes, speeches and live and pre-recorded addresses in the fields of personal, corporate or organizational leadership coaching, life coaching, personal freedom coaching, spirituality coaching, career coaching, motivational and inspirational coaching, business coaching, performance coaching, public speaking coaching, personal development coaching, personal health coaching, success coaching, and consultation in connection with the aforementioned coaching services; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, retreats, conferences, workshops, lectures, classes, speeches and live and pre-recorded addresses in the fields of personal, corporate or organizational leadership coaching, life coaching, personal freedom coaching, spirituality coaching, career coaching, motivational and inspirational coaching, business coaching, performance coaching, public speaking coaching, personal development coaching, personal health coaching, success coaching, and consultation in connection with the aforementioned coaching services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by In Harmony Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by In Harmony Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by In Harmony Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LIVING IN HARMONY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |