USPTO serial 77074249
COOGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Success, NY
Lake Success, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Cox
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded audio and video tapes, phonographic records, compact discs and downloadable sound recordings featuring musical performances; eyeglass frames; sunglass frames; goggles for scuba diving,swimming, skiing, and snow boarding | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automotive Accessories, namely wheels, shift knobs in the nature of gear lever and hand brake knobs,fitted covers for cars, car bras in the nature of fitted covers for cars, pedal pads for vehicle breaks and accelerator, and tire covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Luggage, Duffel Bags, General Purpose Sport Bags, Waist packs, Backpacks, Gym Bags,Attache Cases, Billfolds, Briefcases, Fanny Packs,Key Cases, Umbrellas, and Wallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textile articles not included in other classes, namely pillow cases, pillow shams, towels, bed sheets, bed skirts, comforters, shower curtains, bed spreads,washcloths, dust ruffles, window curtains, draperies and bed blankets | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Automotive accessories, namely floor mats; vehicle floor mats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COOGI PARTNERS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COOGI PARTNERS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named COOGI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | RGOA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |