USPTO serial 77074511
PUBLIC SYNERGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PUBLIC SYNERGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | BUSINESS USE OF HUMAN BEINGS AND TECHNOLOGIES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 035 | TAX COMPLIANCE AND SUBSTANCE | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 036 | FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SELECTION | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 039 | CONSUMER ECONOMICS ADVISORY SERVICES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 040 | EXPERT ASSURANCE SERVICES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 041 | MANAGEMENT VIEW OF THE ORGANIZATION AND THE WORLD | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 042 | BUSINESS USE OF HUMAN BEINGS AND TECHNOLOGIES | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 044 | ASSETS RECOVERY AND ADJUSTMENT | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jun 23, 1997 |
| 045 | EXPERT ASSURANCE SERVICES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jun 23, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEYEMBO MIKANDA, PH.D.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PUBLIC SYNERGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |