Drawing for GROWING UP WITH GATEWAY

USPTO serial 77074635

GROWING UP WITH GATEWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROWING UP WITH GATEWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D. Bangor, Jr.

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Providing managed health care services for members in the fields of infant care and adolescent careACTIVEJan 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 17, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 13, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 13, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 22, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 22, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance