USPTO serial 77075084
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Residential Energy Services Network, Inc.
Oceanside, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Residential Energy Services Network, Inc.
Residential Energy Services Network, Inc.
Oceanside, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Residential Energy Services Network, Inc.
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SERVICES NETWORK, INC.
OCEANSIDE, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SERVICES NETWORK, INC.
Residential Energy Services Network, Inc.
Oceanside, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Residential Energy Services Network, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip L. Nulud
Philip L. Nulud BUCHALTER LLP1000 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Information in the field of energy efficiency, namely, providing information on residential energy performance and residential energy efficiency programs | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1994 |
| 036 | Providing financing information, namely, information on residential energy efficiency financing | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1994 |
| 042 | Accreditation services, namely, adopting and maintaining national standards for home energy ratings for the purpose of accreditation; accreditation services, namely developing, evaluating and testing standards for home energy rating providers, home energy rating training providers and home energy rating software programs for the purpose of accreditation | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 23, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 22, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |