USPTO serial 77075886
FLORYZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLORYZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Dillon
Joan L. Dillon JOAN DILLON LAW, LLC3530 ASHFORD DUNWOODY RD NE PMB 235ATLANTA, GA 30319-2002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR CONDITIONERS AND SHAMPOOS, HAIR SPRAYS, HAIR GELS, MOUSSE AND CREAMS, AND FACE, NON-MEDICATED SKIN AND BODY LOTIONS, CREAMS AND BODY OILS, ANTI-AGING CREAMS, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, BODY WASHES, SCRUBS AND MILKS; COSMETIC, CREAM AND DEODORANT SOAPS AND LIQUID SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE; LIP GLOSS; PERSONAL DEODORANTS; DEODORANTS FOR ANIMALS, FEMININE SPRAY DEODORANTS; NON-MEDICATED FOOT CREAMS AND LOTIONS, SKIN EXFOLIANTS AND DEODORIZERS, AND TOOTHPASTE; EYEBROW PENCILS, FOUNDATION CREAMS, MASCARA, LIPSTICK, FACE POWDER | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | MEDICATED HAIR CARE PRODUCT, NAMELY, NATURAL HAIR LOSS PREVENTION PRODUCT IN THE NATURE OF SCALP CREAMS, SCALP TONERS, SCALP CONDITIONERS, SCALP LOTIONS, SHAMPOOS AND HAIR RINSES AND ACNE TREATMENT PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flora Manufacturing & Distributing, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Flora Manufacturing & Distributing, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named FLORYZA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |