USPTO serial 77076122
CIGARADVISOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3700462Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2009
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CIGARADVISOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, LLC50 South 16th StreetTwo Liberty Place, 22nd FloorPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing consumer product information in the field of cigars, tobacco, smoking articles, and the smoking industry; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring services in the field of cigars, tobacco, smoking articles, and the smoking industry; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring links to retail websites of others selling cigars and smoking accessories and to websites of others in the cigar industry; providing a website featuring consumer information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2004 |
| 041 | Providing a web site featuring news, and commentary in the field of cigars, tobacco, smoking articles, and the smoking industry; providing on-line journals, namely, blogs about cigars, tobacco, smoking, smoking articles, and the cigar industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |