Drawing for OFS

USPTO serial 77076666

OFS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3296774Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with OFS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward V. Charbonneau

Edward V. Charbonneau OFS Fitel, LLC2000 Northeast ExpresswayIntellectual Property Law DivisionNorcross, GA 30071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Manufacturing services for others in the field of video, voice, and data transmission equipmentACTIVENov 16, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2018PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Oct 31, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 12, 2018PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2018PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Mar 15, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2017PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Sep 27, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 18, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 18, 2013EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2013PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Sep 13, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 30, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance