USPTO serial 77076929
VIRTUAL DOORMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 29, 2009
- Examiner
- COOPER, CHRISTINE H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with VIRTUAL DOORMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
New York, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
New York, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
New York, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zeynel M Karcioglu
Zeynel M Karcioglu IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Rd., Suite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security and surveillance systems, namely, audio and video equipment in the nature of video monitors, surveillance cameras, video intercoms, modems and routers, video code cards, speakers, microphones, intercoms, software for operating and interacting with surveillance systems; security and surveillance computer programs for the enabling or prevention of building access; biometrics equipment, namely, biometrics scanners for locking and unlocking entryways and permitting use of systems; remote entry and locking equipment in the nature of biometric locks and locks controlled over IP; proximity sensors; security and surveillance systems, namely, [ electronic regulating and control devices for remote operation of HVAC, ] lighting, elevators, alarms, sirens, gates, locks, audio video equipment, such as [ televisions, stereos, ] computers, [ telephones, ] all for residential buildings and homes; security and surveillance systems, namely, electronic regulating and control devices for the same; none of the above for use with vehicles | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 045 | Monitoring security and surveillance systems | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
- Other trademarks owned by Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
- Other trademarks owned by Future Communications Corporation of New York d/b/a Virtual Service
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL DOORMAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 13, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 13, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |