USPTO serial 77077456
MIGHTY BOMB JACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIGHTY BOMB JACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo 102-8230, JP
Tokyo 102-8230, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Lublinski
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game and video game cartridges and discs; computer game software and video game software; computer game software and video game software for use in accessing and playing computer games and video games online; mobile communication device software for use in accessing and playing computer and video games via wireless medium; downloadable computer programs for playing computer games and video games via global computer and communication networks; computer and video game programs for use with mobile communication devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online and wireless games that may be accessed network-wide by network users; entertainment services namely providing gaming-console-based online games, computer-based online games and mobile communication-based wireless games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |