USPTO serial 77077585
IDOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOUND CARDS; COMBINATION VIDEO PLAYERS AND RECORDERS; DIGITAL AUDIO PLAYERS; MULTI-FUNCTION DIGITAL TRANSMISSION DEVICE, NAMELY, DIGITAL SIGNAL TRANSMISSION DEVICE WITH MULTI-FUNCTION SUCH AS DIFFERENT EQUALIZER, DBX SUB-WOOFER TECHNOLOGY; EARPHONES; AUDIO SPEAKERS; LOUDSPEAKERS; AMPLIFIERS; AUDIO MIXERS; LOW INTERFERENCE AMPLIFIERS; MEGAPHONES; AUDIO SPEAKER ENCLOSURES; AUDIOS, NAMELY, HAND-HELD AUDIO DEVICES, HOME THEATER AUDIO DEVICES, DIGITAL AUDIO DEVICES, COMPUTER RELATED AUDIO DEVICES; AUDIO AND VIDEO FREQUENCY CONTROLLER; SURROUND SOUND EFFECT PROCESSOR; DIGITAL SIGNAL MIXER; AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSOR; COMPUTER SPEAKERS; PLAYING DEVICES FOR SOUND CARRIERS; KARAOKE MACHINES | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |