USPTO serial 77077778
E3 - EFFICIENCY, EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E3 - EFFICIENCY, EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Louisville, KY
Louisville, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzan J. Hixon
SUZAN J. HIXON GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC101 SOUTH FIFTH STREET3500 NATIONAL CITY TOWERLOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing consumer information in the field of health care cost review via the Internet; cost and business management of health, dental and vision benefit plans; health care cost review; health care cost utilization and review services; providing health care cost information to health plan participants; providing comparative cost and service analysis of health care providers to health plan participants; providing information in the field of health care utilization and review services, namely, information concerning the evaluation of health care facilities and providers; providing statistical information concerning health care facility costs and quality; providing medical cost consultation, management and tracking; business management and consulting in the field of health care cost containment for health plan sponsors, namely, providing information to clients and plan participants on ways to contain and reduce costs of health care; providing consumer information in the field of health care services, dental and vision plans | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing information in insurance matters, namely, health insurance, dental and life insurance, and employee benefit and insurance programs; providing information on insurance plans for health benefits participants; providing on-line information in the field of health insurance, dental and life insurance, and finance; providing on-line information regarding employee benefit and insurance programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | providing health information; providing on-line health information; providing health care wellness information, consultation and advice related to health care treatments to patients and health benefits participants; providing information, consultation, and advice in the field of nutrition, diet, health and wellness to patients and health benefits participants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Humana Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Humana Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named E3 - EFFICIENCY, EFFECTIVENESS, EXPERIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |