USPTO serial 77077797
WW WHITEWATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3972237Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WW WHITEWATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
BRENT E. ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | (Based on Reg 194856) Water treatment installations and equipment for municipal, industrial, agriculture, commercial and residential applications, namely, filtering units and water filtration systems comprised of water conditioners and granular activated carbon, reverse osmosis units, ultraviolet water sterilizing units, chemical feed pumps, air injections units and acid neutralizing units, all for producing potable water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | (Based on Reg 194857) Aerated mineral water and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, drinking water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | (Based on Reg 194856) Remote data logging, namely, data entry for producing potable water for water treatment installations and equipment for municipal, industrial, agriculture, commercial and residential applications, including filtering units and water filtration systems comprising of water conditioners and granular activated carbon, reverse osmosis units, ultraviolet water sterilizing units, chemical feed pumps, air injections units and acid neutralizing units | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | (Based on Reg 194858) Treatment of water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | (Based on Reg 194856) Remote monitoring of water treatment processing apparatus for producing potable water for water treatment installations and equipment for municipal, industrial, agriculture, commercial and residential applications, including filtering units and water filtration systems comprising of water conditioners and granular activated carbon, reverse osmosis units, ultraviolet water sterilizing units, chemical feed pumps, air injections units and acid neutralizing units | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Whitewater Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Whitewater Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Whitewater Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WW WHITEWATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |