USPTO serial 77077873
SOFIE & ME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4389921Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 2013
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOFIE & ME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Vancouver, CA
North Vancouver, CA
North Vancouver, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Dergosits
Michael E. Dergosits DERGOSITS & NOAH LLPOne Embarcadero Center, Suite 350San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal Care Products, namely, soaps, body oils, shampoo, sunscreen cream, beauty creams; baby skin care products, namely, baby oil, cosmetics, baby wipes, baby shampoo, baby lotion | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Bath linens, namely, bath towels and bath mitts, beach towels, children's towels, face towels, hand towels, hooded towels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Children's clothing and accessories, namely, dresses, belts, caps, infant and toddler one piece clothing, short sets, tops, pants, shorts, ties, shoes, cloth diapers, and textile diapers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOCHEN SCHLIESSLER
- Other trademarks owned by JOCHEN SCHLIESSLER
- Other trademarks owned by JOCHEN SCHLIESSLER
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SOFIE & ME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |