USPTO serial 77078738
MULTIFIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIFIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
42567 Heiligenhaus, DE
42567 Heiligenhaus, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal fittings, namely, multipoint locks, bolt locks, flush bolt locks, door locks, rebate locks, double door set fittings used for doors, gates and windows; metal locks for doors gates and windows; metal handles for doors, gates and windows; metal locking bar and bolt mechanisms; metal shoot bolts; metal locking bolts; metal door bolts; and replacement parts for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal fittings, namely, multipoint locks, cremone bolt locks, flush bolt locks, door locks, rebate locks, double door set fittings used for doors, gates and windows; plastic handles for doors gates and windows; plastic locks for doors, gates and windows; plastic locking bar and bolt mechanisms; plastic shoot bolts; plastic locking bolts; plastic door bolts; and replacement parts for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical planning, design and development for others in the field of metal and non-metal locking mechanisms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Fuhr GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Fuhr GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MULTIFIX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PMSM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |