USPTO serial 77079396
TOOLMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOOLMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Joseph Trojan, YeWon Min
R. JOSEPH TROJAN, YEWON MIN TROJAN LAW OFFICES9250 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 325BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-3376UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Bits for hand drills; Hand tools namely, clamps; Hand tools namely, hammers; Hand tools namely, ratchet wrenches; Hand tools namely, saws; Hand tools namely, scrapers; Hand tools namely, screwdrivers; Hand tools namely, socket sets; Hand tools namely, wrenches; Hand tools, namely, hex keys wrenches; Hand tools, namely, nail sets; Hand tools, namely, paint scrapers; Hand tools, namely, putty knives; Hand tools, namely, socket wrenches; Hand-operated sharpening tools and instruments; Knives; Saws; Tool holders; Wrenches | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |