USPTO serial 77079436
CROCUTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3755041Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2010
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CROCUTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Smithfield, VA
Smithfield, VA
Smithfield, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven B. Lehat
1025 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, trousers, jeans, overalls, shorts, shirts, sweaters, jackets, vests, t-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, suspenders, neckties, caps, hats, headbands, belts, tops, crop tops, tank tops, track pants, cycle pants, sports tops, sports shorts, unitards, leotards, tights, leggings, leg warmers, sports bras, footwear, socks, and rainwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 3, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |