Drawing for ACTICARE

USPTO serial 77079669

ACTICARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SERVANCE, RENEE L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTICARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical agents for impregnating, binding or coating of textiles, furs and leather, non-wovens and fabricsACTIVE—
002Coatings in the nature of clear finishes for textiles and fabricsACTIVE—
012Car seat coversACTIVE—
024Textile fabrics for use in automotive interior trim, sports clothing, outdoor clothing, protective clothing and for the manufacture of clothing used by the military, medical personnel, technical professionals and personnel in hygiene fields; window coverings and treatments in the nature of curtains, draperies, sheers, swags and valancesACTIVE—
040Protective treatments of textiles and fabrics, namely, anti-soil, water repellent, anti-static, anti-odor, easy-clean and bacterial resistantACTIVE—
042Design services, namely, the design of textiles and fabrics for use in automotive interiorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance