USPTO serial 77079859
THANKME NOTES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THANKME NOTES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Highland Park, NJ
Highland Park, NJ
Newtown, PA
Newtown, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosemarie R. Wilk-Orescan
1 BLAYZE CTNEWTOWN, PA 18940-1262UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic greeting cards with attached thank-you notes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Greeting cards with one or more detachably connected thank-you notes; Thank-you notes; Cardboard display units for temporarily housing greeting cards with detachably connected thank-you notes during a party or special occasion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Green, Reza
- Other trademarks owned by Green, Reza
- Other trademarks owned by Wilk-Orescan, Rosemarie R.
- Other trademarks owned by Wilk-Orescan, Rosemarie R.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THANKME NOTES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |