USPTO serial 77080091
CONVERSATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONVERSATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen Quiroz
KATHLEEN QUIROZ OPPENHEIMER, BLEND, HARRISON & TATE, INC.711 NAVARRO ST FL 6SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-1711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Ankle bracelets; Bracelets; Charms; Chokers; Costume jewelry; Ear clips; Ear studs; Earrings; Jewelry; Necklaces; Ornamental pins; Rings being jewelry; Watches; Wrist watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; All-purpose athletic bags; All-purpose carrying bags; Animal carriers; Athletic bags; Backpacks; Bags for carrying babies' accessories; Barrel bags; Beach bags; Book bags; Briefcases; Bumbags; Carry-all bags; Carry-on bags; Carryalls; Change purses; Clutch bags; Clutch purses; Clutches; Coin purses; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Cosmetic cases sold empty; Credit card cases; Diaper bags; Duffel bags; Duffle bags; Evening handbags; Fanny packs; Garment bags for travel; General purpose bags for carrying yoga equipment; Gladstone bags; Gym bags; Handbags; Hipsacks; Infant carriers worn on the body; Key case; Knapsacks; Luggage; Make-up bags sold empty; Messenger bags; Multi-purpose purses; Overnight bags; Overnight cases; Overnight suitcases; Pocketbooks; Pullmans; Purses; Roll bags; Satchels; Shoe bags for travel; Shoulder bags; Small clutch purses; Small purses; Sports bags; Suit bags; Suitcases; Toiletry cases sold empty; Tote bags; Travel bags; Trunks; Wallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Belts; Blazers; Blouses; Capri pants; Capris; Caps; Caps with visors; Coats; Dresses; Gauchos; Halter tops; Hats; Headbands; Jackets; Lingerie; Night gowns; Pajamas; Pants; Pantsuits; Robes; Scarves; Shawls and headscarves; Shirts; Shorts; Skirt suits; Skirts; Sleepwear; Suits; Sweaters; Tops; Tunics | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Barrettes; Bobby pins; Braids; Clam clips for hair; Hair accessories, namely, claw clips; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair bands; Hair bows; Hair buckles; Hair clips; Hair curl clips; Hair extensions; Hair ornaments; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair pieces; Hair pins and grips; Hair ribbons; Hair scrunchies; Oriental hair pins; Ornamental bows of textile for decoration; Ornamental ribbons made of textiles; Ponytail holders; Ribbons; Wigs; Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by United Fashions of Texas, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named CONVERSATIONS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |